Verified fire suppression performance across lithium battery, oil, and electrical fire scenarios.
Our aerogel fire extinguishing technology has been tested under controlled fire scenarios, simulating real-world industrial risks including:
All tests are conducted using repeatable conditions and measurable performance indicators.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
All tests conducted under real fire conditions. Data available upon request.
Aerogel-based fire suppression combines rapid cooling, oxygen isolation, and high-temperature resistant foam formation to stop combustion at its source.
Upon contact with heat, the water-based system rapidly absorbs heat energy, lowering surface temperature within seconds.
Nano-porous silica aerogel forms a stable, heat-resistant foam layer that isolates oxygen and fuel.
The solid aerogel skeleton structure prevents burn-back and significantly reduces re-ignition risk.
Test results show significant performance differences between fire suppression technologies. Choosing the right solution directly impacts safety, equipment protection, and long-term cost.
| Criteria | ⭐ Aerogel | Dry Powder | Foam (AFFF) | CO₂ | Water |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fire Classes | A, B, E, F | A, B, C | A, B | B, E | A |
| Extinguishing Speed | ⚡ Seconds | Fast | Medium | Fast | Slow |
| Re-ignition Risk | ✅ None | ⚠️ Possible | ❌ High | ❌ High | ❌ High |
| Electrical Safety | Up to 36kV | Residue Risk | Not Safe | Safe | Not Safe |
| Cooling Capability | ★★★★★ | ★ | ★★★ | ★ | ★★★★ |
| Residue | Minimal | Heavy | Moderate | None | None |
| Equipment Damage | None | High | Medium | None | High |
| Environmental Impact | Eco-friendly (REACH) | Dust Pollution | PFAS Risk | CO₂ Emission | Low |
| Maintenance Cost | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Full fire test reports and application-specific data are available upon request.